For blog harnessingunlimitedhydropower.blogspot.com
Please first visit devbahadurdongol.blogspot.com for
details on “harnessing unlimited hydropower: end of power crisis” and “climate
change due to gases is impossible: cause and solution”.
Dear Joe O,
houston2000 <houston2000@peoplepc.com>
For a given hydropower installation, height and cross
section of the penstock pipe are fixed. In running water condition the rate of
discharged water and its velocity are constant.
1. Velocity is achieved by height difference between the
intake and discharge points, higher the difference the greater is the velocity
of running water. K.E.? So v is other
side of p difference. V determines the RPM of the turbine.
2. In a running
uniform water column, the pressure effect at any point between inlet and outlet
points are same (the pressure effect is uniform throughout the water column.
This is not so in standing still water column where pressure varies according
the height or depth). - Fluid properties.
3. So each turbine will have the same total force due to
the height of the water column independently. Whether one or more turbines are
installed, it makes no difference. Nowadays turbines are made very efficient,
almost 98%.
4. The force of gravity is acting here, the G is
constant, never reduced, never shifted and never blocked at a given point; so
the total force available at any given point of the running water column is
constant and independent to each other.
5. If it were zero pressure difference after the first
turbine water will stop but you know water continues with the same velocity.
Velocity of water before and after any turbine is the same. Turbines don’t
decrease the power of running water. So you can run uniformly as many turbines
as space allows between the intake and discharge points of water column.
(# I made presentation on this topic at many places like
hydropower association, professors, engineer’s association, public places etc.
Comments like yours always came from the engineers only. I wonder if you are an
engineer! I earnestly request you to go through the explanations in my blog:
devbahadurdongol.blogspot.com)
I am proud of you for your interest on this matter.
With regards,
Dev
First reply
Joe 0
Dear Joe O,
"that the TOTAL OUTPUT was reduced with each
additional turbine added....his experiment and hypothesis is absurd"
Since the water will continue with the same velocity
after hitting the runner of the turbine as before hitting the runner,
how can you claim the total out put is reduced by each additional turbine?, if that is
so then the velocity of water will also be decreased.
Dr. Dev
houston2000 <houston2000@peoplepc.com>